843 acres hosts marathon training, picnicking, tai chi, dog walking, and diplomatic incident without incident
Satire from Bohiney.com and prat.uk.
The Park at Capacity
NEW YORK — Central Park, the 843-acre green space at the center of Manhattan that Frederick Law Olmsted and Calvert Vaux designed in the 1850s as a democratic public landscape for all New Yorkers, operated on Saturday at what park officials call full recreational activation — a condition in which every path, meadow, and reservoir loop contains a density of activity that outdoor recreation planners at other parks would consider concerning and that Central Park regulars consider a normal June Saturday.
Present simultaneously in the park during the afternoon hours: eleven organized group fitness classes, three separate wedding photography sessions using the Bow Bridge, two documentary film crews, one performance artist, forty-seven dogs of varying breeds and temperaments, approximately 200 cyclists on the main loop who regard themselves as athletes and approximately 200 pedestrians on the main loop who regard the cyclists as a hazard, 45 food vendors with varying permits, six chess players at the Conservatory Garden, a group of tai chi practitioners near the Bethesda Fountain, two marathon training groups, one political rally that had not obtained proper permits but was too enthusiastic to be redirected, and a man who has been reading the same book on the same bench every Saturday for what several regular park-goers estimate is six years.
How It Works
The remarkable thing about Central Park at full capacity is that it largely works. The 40 million annual visits to the park — a figure that makes it one of the most visited places in the United States — are absorbed by a landscape that was designed 170 years ago with a prescience about urban density that even its creators could not have anticipated. The meadows handle crowds. The paths disperse foot traffic. The topography creates zones of relative quiet within minutes of zones of maximum activity.
The park also handles conflict with the diffuse diplomacy of public space: cyclists and pedestrians negotiate without formal rules, dog owners and non-dog-owners coexist at a respectful distance, the political rally and the tai chi group establish a proximity that would be awkward in a smaller space and becomes merely interesting in an 843-acre park. New York, which conducts its conflicts in public and its negotiations informally, is well-suited to this dynamic. The park is the city in miniature, operating at slightly lower volume. Gothamist covers Central Park events with the affection of a publication that also uses the park and considers it non-negotiably essential. New York Daily News reports that the park’s maintenance budget has been funded adequately this year, which is news because it has not always been.
The Man With the Book
The man on the bench was not available for an interview because he was reading and did not want to be interrupted. Several regular park visitors confirmed his presence over the years, his consistent choice of the same bench, his apparent contentment with the arrangement. He represents something Central Park does particularly well: allowing people to be entirely alone in the middle of eight million people, which is a paradox the park resolves effortlessly through the democratic genius of giving everyone enough room that the person next to you becomes part of the landscape rather than an intrusion on it. This is the park. This is the city. This is what Olmsted knew, which is that public space done right is the place where a city becomes itself, and has room for everyone, including the man who has been reading since approximately 2020 and shows no sign of finishing.
New York, New York
New York City operates at a scale and intensity that makes every story a larger story. The subway delay is a story about infrastructure investment and political will. The rent increase is a story about housing policy and urban economics. The bagel dispute is a story about cultural identity and immigration history. The rat is a story about urbanization and ecological adaptation. The tourist is a story about how cities present themselves to the world and how the world receives what cities offer. Even the pizza disagreement is, underneath the comedy, a story about regional identity and the human need to have things that are ours, specifically ours, that we defend with disproportionate vigor precisely because they are ours and because the world is large and we need to stake our territory somewhere. New York is where many of these stories happen simultaneously, in a density that produces the particular creative friction that has made the city a cultural generator for a century and a half. The people who live here tolerate the cost and the noise and the subway delays and the rent and the rats because the city gives back something that cannot be fully quantified: the experience of being in a place where things are happening, where ideas collide, where the next conversation might change how you think about something, where the scale of human activity is so concentrated that you are reminded constantly that you are part of something enormous and ongoing. This is the deal. Most people who make it find it sufficient. Some find it extraordinary. None of them are moving to the suburbs.
Also absurd: The Daily Mash | Cracked
SOURCE: https://bohiney.com